4.5 Article

Leukocytes and systemic inflammatory response syndrome as prognostic factors in pulmonary embolism patients

Journal

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-13-74

Keywords

Leukocytosis; Pulmonary embolism; Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hemodynamic status and cardiac function are important factors for predicting pulmonary embolism (PE) prognosis. Although inflammation is considered a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis, the prognostic significance of both systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and leukocytosis has not been elucidated. This study evaluates PE prognostic factors, including SIRS and leukocytes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 667 PE patients. Risk evaluation included SIRS and leukocytosis. A prediction model was developed based on independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Results: Fifty-seven patients (8.5%) died within 30 days of PE. Multivariate analysis showed that SIRS satisfying the WBC criteria (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-5.4), altered mental status (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.88.7), shock (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-7.1), and right-to-left ventricle diameter ratio (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8) were associated with 30-day mortality. SIRS criteria, including body temperature (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.4-14.8), heart rate (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.6), respiratory rate (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.6), and white blood cells (WBC) count (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5) predicted short-term mortality following PE. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the prognostic model performance was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85); pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and PESI + WBC count were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.75) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.79, P < 0.001 versus PESI), respectively. Conclusions: Leukocytosis and SIRS are important factors in determining short-term outcomes in PE patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available