4.5 Article

Safety and efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy in adolescent and adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomised controlled trial

Journal

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-67

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Abbott
  2. Alcon
  3. Amgen
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Berringer-Ingleheim
  6. Ception
  7. Dey
  8. Dyax
  9. Genentech
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. MAP
  12. MedImmune
  13. Novartis
  14. Sanofi-Aventis
  15. Sepracor
  16. Shire
  17. TEVA
  18. Schering Plough
  19. Altana
  20. Methapharma
  21. Roche
  22. Nycomed
  23. ONO pharma
  24. KOS Pharmaceuticals
  25. SkyePharma
  26. SkyePharma, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of a new asthma therapy combining fluticasone propionate and formoterol fumarate (fluticasone/formoterol; flutiform(R)), administered twice daily (b.i.d.) via a single aerosol inhaler, compared with its individual components administered separately and placebo, in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. Methods: Patients aged >= 12 years were evenly randomised to 12 weeks of treatment with fluticasone/formoterol (100/10 mu g b.i.d.), fluticasone (100 mu g b.i.d.), formoterol (10 mu g b.i.d.), or placebo, in this double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study. The three co-primary endpoints were: a) change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) from morning pre-dose at baseline to pre-dose at week 12 for the comparison with formoterol; b) change in FEV1 from morning pre-dose at baseline to 2 hours post-dose at week 12 for the comparison with fluticasone, and c) time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy from baseline to week 12 for the comparison with placebo. Safety was assessed based on adverse events, clinical laboratory tests and vital sign evaluations. Results: Statistically significant differences were demonstrated for all the three co-primary endpoints. Fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy showed significantly greater improvements from baseline to end of study in the change in pre-dose FEV1 compared with formoterol (Least Squares (LS) mean treatment difference: 0.101 L; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.002, 0.199; p = 0.045) and the change in pre-dose compared with 2 hours post-dose FEV1 versus fluticasone (LS mean treatment difference: 0.200 L; 95% CI: 0.109, 0.292; p < 0.001). The time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was significantly longer for patients in the combination therapy group compared with those receiving placebo (p = 0.015). Overall, the results from multiple secondary endpoints assessing lung function, asthma symptoms, and rescue medication use supported the superior efficacy of the combination product compared with fluticasone, formoterol, and placebo. The fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy had a good safety and tolerability profile over the 12 week treatment period. Conclusions: Fluticasone/formoterol had a good safety and tolerability profile and showed statistically superior efficacy for the three co-primary endpoints compared to fluticasone, formoterol, and placebo, in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available