4.5 Article

On-road measurements and modelling of vehicular emissions during traffic interruption and congestion events in an urban traffic corridor

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 480-492

Publisher

TURKISH NATL COMMITTEE AIR POLLUTION RES & CONTROL-TUNCAP
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2018.09.008

Keywords

Traffic flow; Instantaneous driving profile; Emission model; Congestion; Traffic speed

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traffic events such as interruptions and congestions occur on urban roads causing higher vehicular emissions resulting in air-pollution hotspots. This study investigates the performances of two emission models for estimating emissions from passenger cars and auto-rickshaws of different mileages, moving with a traffic fleet during these events. The instantaneous measurements of emissions and speeds were carried out on a test route of 3.8 km by integrating the auto-gas analyser and V-Box for estimating the on-road emission factors (EFs). The measured driving profiles and acceleration/decelerations were used in the IVE emission model and the speed was averaged in the COPERT-IV emission model into 0-10 km/h; 10-25 km/h; 25-35 km/h and > 35 km/h. The on-road EFs of CO, HC, CO2 and NOx at peak hours (PHs) and off-peak hours (OPHs) were compared with the modelled EFs. The estimates of COPERT-IV were about 25% less for CO, HC and CO2 and 26-39% more for NOx than IVE during PHs. As compared to the on-road EF, the IVE estimates for CO, HC, CO2 was 5-50% less and 12-50% higher for NOx for auto-rickshaw and passenger car; and the COPERT-IV estimates for CO, HC, CO2 were 30-74% less and 6-86% higher for NOx, showing that instantaneous driving profiles in emission modelling are important. The interruptions during PHs were 80% of the time, a cause of deviations in the models. Thus, the real-world emissions vary with the levels of interruptions and congestions on the roads, and hence emission models must account for these events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available