4.3 Article

Modified Newton-Raphson method to tune feedback gains of control system for standing by functional neuromuscular stimulation following spinal cord injury

Journal

APPLIED BIONICS AND BIOMECHANICS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 169-174

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2014/634509

Keywords

Standing; functional neuromuscular stimulation; spinal cord injury; feedback control system; adaptive algorithm

Funding

  1. NIH [R01NS040547, T32AR00750525]
  2. VA IRB [2008-027]
  3. MHMC IRB [05-00430]
  4. VA AWARD [A9259-L]
  5. NCATS [UL1TR000439]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) can restore standing capabilities following spinal cord injury. Feedback control of these systems can optimize performance by reducing the required upper extremity support. However, tuning these control systems can be intensive and clinically inconvenient. OBJECTIVE: This case study investigated a clinical method to efficiently tune feedback gains for a control system utilizing feedback of total body center of mass acceleration to modulate stimulation levels to targeted paralyzed musculature of the lower extremities and trunk. METHODS: Gains for this control system were tuned to minimize the stabilization loading by one arm against internal postural perturbations volitionally-generated during manipulation of an object using the other arm. An algorithm based on a modified form of the Newton-Raphson method was employed to find the optimal feedback gains with lower subject effort than that to determine the original tuning curves. RESULTS: This method accurately (<6.2% error) approximated the optimal gains with 70% fewer manipulations by the subject. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that optimal feedback gains for the specific FNS control system can be determined systematically with considerably less effort than heuristic gain tuning. This demonstrates the potential for devising simple, convenient methods for effective system re-tuning during clinical usage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available