4.7 Article

Enzyme-Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Efficient Antibacterial Agents In Vivo

Journal

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
Volume 2, Issue 10, Pages 1351-1360

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201300051

Keywords

lysozyme; mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs); antibacterial agents

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB932701]
  2. 100-Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2132053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the fact that pathogenic infections are widely treated by antibiotics in the clinic nowadays, the increasing risk of multidrug-resistance associated with abuse of antibiotics is becoming a major concern in global public health. The increased death toll caused by pathogenic bacterial infection calls for effective antibiotic alternatives. Lysozyme-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs subset of Lys) are reported as antibacterial agents that exhibit efficient antibacterial activity both in vitro and in vivo with low cytotoxicity and negligible hemolytic side effect. The Lys corona provides multivalent interaction between MSNs subset of Lys and bacterial walls and consequently raises the local concentration of Lys on the surface of cell walls, which promotes hydrolysis of peptidoglycans and increases membrane-perturbation abilities. The minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) of MSNs subset of Lys is fivefold lower than that of free Lys in vitro. The antibacterial efficacy of MSNs subset of Lys is evaluated in vivo by using an intestine-infected mouse model. Experimental results indicate that the number of bacteria surviving in the colon is three orders of magnitude lower than in the untreated group. These natural antibacterial enzyme-modified nanoparticles open up a new avenue for design and synthesis of next-generation antibacterial agents as alternatives to antibiotics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available