4.7 Article

SYNZIP Protein Interaction Toolbox: in Vitro and in Vivo Specifications of Heterospecific Coiled-Coil Interaction Domains

Journal

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages 118-129

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sb200015u

Keywords

protein-protein interaction; synthetic biology; coiled coil; heterodimer

Funding

  1. NSF [MCB 0950233]
  2. National Institutes of Health [RO1 GM55040, PN2 EY016546, P50 GMO81879]
  3. NSF Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [0950233] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthetic biology toolkit contains a growing number of parts for regulating transcription and translation, but very few that can be used to control protein association. Here we report characterization of 22 previously published heterospecific synthetic coiled-coil peptides called SYNZIPs. We present biophysical analysis of the oligomerization states, helix orientation's and affinities of :27 SYNZIP pairs. SYNZIP pairs were also tested for interaction in two cell based assays. In a yeast two-hybrid screen, >85% of 253 comparable interactions were consistent with prior in vitro measurements made using coiled-coil microarrays. In a yeast-signaling assay controlled by coiled coil mediated scaffolding, 12 SYNZIP pairs were successfully used to down regulate the expression of a,reporter, gee following treatment with a-factor. Characterization of these interaction modules dramatically increases the number Of available protein interaction parts for synthetic biology and should facilitate a wide range of molecular engineering applications. Summary characteristics of 27 SYNZIP peptide pairs are reported in specification sheets available in the Supporting Information and at the SYNZIP Web site [http://keatingweb.mit.edu/SYNZIP/].

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available