4.2 Article

The Impact of Hippocampal Lesions on Trace-Eyeblink Conditioning and Forebrain-Cerebellar Interactions

Journal

BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 129, Issue 4, Pages 512-522

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/bne0000061

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; declarative memory; hippocampus; prefrontal cortex; schizophrenia

Funding

  1. United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [RO1 NS059879]
  2. NIH, National Institute of Mental Health [RO1 MH47340, NIA R37 AG008796]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Behavioral Neuroscience published a pivotal paper by Moyer, Deyo, and Disterhoft (1990) 25 years ago that described the impaired acquisition of trace-eyeblink conditioning in rabbits with complete removal of the hippocampus. As part of the Behavioral Neuroscience celebration commemorating the 30th anniversary of the journal, we reflect upon the impact of that study on understanding the role of the hippocampus, forebrain, and forebrain-cerebellar interactions that mediate acquisition and retention of trace-conditioned responses, and of declarative memory more globally. We discuss the expansion of the conditioning paradigm to species other than the rabbit, the heterogeneity of responses among hippocampal neurons during trace conditioning, the responsivity of hippocampal neurons following consolidation of conditioning, the role of awareness in conditioning, how blink conditioning can be used as a translational tool by assaying potential therapeutics for cognitive enhancement, how trace and delay classical conditioning may be used to investigate neurological disorders including Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia, and how the 2 paradigms may be used to understand the relationship between declarative (explicit) and nondeclarative (implicit) memory systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available