4.7 Article

Viscosity of Ring Polymer Melts

Journal

ACS MACRO LETTERS
Volume 2, Issue 10, Pages 874-878

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mz400344e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EU [214627, 262348]
  2. NRF [2008-0061892, 2012R1A2A2A01015148]
  3. NSF [CHE-0911588, DMR-0907515, DMR-1121107, DMR-1122483]
  4. NIH [1-P5-HL107168, 1-P01-HL108808-01A1]
  5. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Chemistry [0911588] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Materials Research [0907515] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have measured the linear rheology of critically purified ring polyisoprenes, polystyrenes, and polyethyleneoxides of different molar masses. The ratio of the zero-shear viscosities of linear polymer melts eta(0,linear) to their ring counterparts eta(0,ring) at isofrictional conditions is discussed as a function of the number of entanglements Z. In the unentangled regime eta(0,linear)/eta(0,ring) is virtually constant, consistent with the earlier data, atomistic simulations, and the theoretical expectation eta(0,linear)/eta(0,ring) = 2. In the entanglement regime, the Z-dependence of ring viscosity is much weaker than that of linear polymers, in qualitative agreement with predictions from scaling theory and simulations. The power-law extracted from the available experimental data in the rather limited range 1 < Z < 20, eta(0,linear)/eta(0,ring) similar to Z(1.2 +/- 0.3), is weaker than the scaling prediction (eta(0,linear)/eta(0,ring) similar to Z(1.6 +/- 0.3)) and the simulations (eta(0,linear)/eta(0,ring) similar to Z(2.0 +/- 0.3)). Nevertheless, the present collection of state-of-the-art experimental data unambiguously demonstrates that rings exhibit a universal trend clearly departing from that of their linear counterparts, and hence it represents a major step toward resolving a 30-year-old problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available