4.5 Article

Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma: Influence of Clinical and Demographic Factors on Prognosis: A SEER Analysis

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages 806-814

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.005

Keywords

Chondrosarcoma; Chordoma; Outcomes; Prognosis; Skull base

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Chordomas and chondrosarcomas are rare skull base tumors, with similar radiographic and clinical presentations. We investigated factors influencing long-term survival in these 2 tumors using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: Patients with chordoma (n = 416) and chondrosarcoma (n = 269) within the skull base from 1983 to 2009 were identified within the SEER database. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test associations with survival. t tests and chi(2) tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Chordoma and chondrosarcoma patients were similar demographically. Survival at 5 years was 65% for chordomas and 81.8% (P < 0.0001) for chondrosarcomas and at 10 years was 32.3% and 49.5% (P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis demonstrated chordomas had a worse prognosis even when we controlled for age and tumor size (hazard ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.9-4.7, P < 0.0001). For chordomas, multivariate analysis demonstrated increasing age and tumor size were significantly associated with reduced survival. For chondrosarcomas, multivariate analysis demonstrated older age, earlier decade of diagnosis, and mesenchymal subtype were significantly associated with reduced survival. Postoperative radiation was given to 42% and 41% of patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas, respectively. The addition of radiation did not improve survival. CONCLUSION: Consistent with previous case series, skull base chordomas have significantly worse prognosis than chondrosarcomas. Patients in the SEER database had worse survival overall compared with existing case series for both chordomas and chondrosarcomas, suggesting selection bias in the existing literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available