4.7 Article

Organ culture of seminiferous tubules using a modified soft agar culture system

Journal

STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0997-8

Keywords

Seminiferous tubules; Testicular cells; Soft agar culture system; Differentiation; Proliferation

Funding

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences [28749]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In-vitro spermatogenesis in mammalian species is considered an important topic in reproductive biology. New strategies for achieving a complete version of spermatogenesis ex vivo have been conducted using an organ culture method or culture of testicular cells in a three-dimensional soft agar culture system (SACS). The aim of this study was to develop a new method that supports spermatogenesis to the meiotic phase and morphologically mature spermatozoa through the culture of testicular cells and seminiferous tubules (STs) in a modified SACS, respectively. Methods: First, enzymatically dissociated testicular cells and mechanically dissociated STs of neonatal mice were separately embedded in agarose and then placed on the flat surface of agarose gel half-soaked in the medium to continue culture with a gas-liquid interphase method. Results: Following 40 days of culture, the meiotic (Scp3) and post-meiotic (Acr) gene expression in aggregates and STs was confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. These results were complemented by immunohistochemistry. The presence of morphologically mature spermatozoa in the frozen sections of STs was demonstrated with hematoxylin and eosin staining. We observed Plzf- or Integrin alpha 6-positive spermatogonia in both cultures after 40 days, indicating the potency of the culture system for both self-renewal and differentiation. Conclusions: This technique can be used as a valuable approach for performing research on spermatogenesis and translating it into the human clinical setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available