Journal
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32779-3
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2015-68007-23133]
- U.S. National Science Foundation's Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems Program [1313677]
- Michigan State University AgBioResearch
- USDA/NIFA HATCH [MCL02368]
- Swiss National Science Foundation [P300P2_167689]
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300P2_167689] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
- Direct For Biological Sciences
- Division Of Environmental Biology [1612587, 1313677] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Not all areas of a farmer's field are equal; some always produce more relative to the rest of the field, others always less, while still other areas fluctuate in their production capacity from one year to the next, depending on the interaction between climate, soil, topography and management. Understanding why the yield in certain portions of a field has a high variability over time-we call these areas unstable-is of paramount importance both from an economic and an environmental point of view, as it is through the better management of these areas that we can improve yields or reduce input costs and environmental impact. In this research, we analyzed data from 338 fields cultivated with maize, soybean, wheat and cotton in the US Midwest to understand how topographic attributes and rain affect yield stability over time. In addition to this high resolution yield monitor dataset, we used publicly available data on topography, rain and soil information to test the hypothesis that within-field areas characterized by a low topographic wetness index (proxy for areas with probability of lower water content) always perform poorly (low and stable yield) compared to the rest of the field because they are drier, and that areas of a field characterized by a mid-high wetness index (high and stable yield) always perform well relative to rest of the field because they have greater water availability to plants. The relative performance of areas of a field with a very high wetness index (e.g. depressions) strongly depends on rain patterns because they may be waterlogged in wet years, yielding less than the rest of the field, or wetter during dry years, yielding more than the rest of the field. We present three different observations from this dataset to support our hypothesis. First, we show that the average topographic wetness index in the different stability zones is lower in low and stable yield areas, high in high and stable yield areas and even higher in unstable yield areas (p < 0.05). Second, we show that in dry years (low precipitation at plant emergence or in July), unstable zones perform relatively better compared to the rest of the field. Third, we show that temporal yield variability is positively correlated (p < 0.05) with the probability of observing gleying processes associated with waterlogging for part of the year. These findings shed light on mechanisms underlying temporal variability of yield and can help guide management solutions to increase profit and improve environmental quality.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available