4.7 Article

Lipid-Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for the Delivery of the ML336 Antiviral to Inhibit Encephalitic Alphavirus Infection

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32033-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA-0003525]
  2. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [1002720595]
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at SNL [190245]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) poses a major public health risk due to its amenability for use as a bioterrorism agent and its severe health consequences in humans. ML336 is a recently developed chemical inhibitor of VEEV, shown to effectively reduce VEEV infection in vitro and in vivo. However, its limited solubility and stability could hinder its clinical translation. To overcome these limitations, lipid-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles (LC-MSNs) were employed. The large surface area of the MSN core promotes hydrophobic drug loading while the liposome coating retains the drug and enables enhanced circulation time and biocompatibility, providing an ideal ML336 delivery platform. LC-MSNs loaded 20 +/- 3.4 mu g ML336/mg LC-MSN and released 6.6 +/- 1.3 mu g/mg ML336 over 24 hours. ML336-loaded LC-MSNs significantly inhibited VEEV in vitro in a dose-dependent manner as compared to unloaded LC-MSNs controls. Moreover, cell-based studies suggested that additional release of ML336 occurs after endocytosis. In vivo safety studies were conducted in mice, and LC-MSNs were not toxic when dosed at 0.11 g LC-MSNs/kg/day for four days. ML336-loaded LC-MSNs showed significant reduction of brain viral titer in VEEV infected mice compared to PBS controls. Overall, these results highlight the utility of LC-MSNs as drug delivery vehicles to treat VEEV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available