4.7 Article

Root exudate metabolomes change under drought and show limited capacity for recovery

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30150-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Government grant [CGL2016-79835]
  2. European Research Council Synergy grant [ERC-2013-SyG-610028 IMBALANCE-P]
  3. European FP7 S-Clima project [PIEF-GA-2013-626234]
  4. Catalan Government grant [SGR 2017-1005]
  5. Scholarly Studies programme of the Smithsonian Institution
  6. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic CzeCOS ProCES [CZ. 02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001609, LO1415]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Root exudates comprise a large variety of compounds released by plants into the rhizosphere, including low-molecular-weight primary metabolites (particularly saccharides, amino acids and organic acids) and secondary metabolites (phenolics, flavonoids and terpenoids). Changes in exudate composition could have impacts on the plant itself, on other plants, on soil properties (e.g. amount of soil organic matter), and on soil organisms. The effects of drought on the composition of root exudates, however, have been rarely studied. We used an ecometabolomics approach to identify the compounds in the exudates of Quercus ilex (holm oak) under an experimental drought gradient and subsequent recovery. Increasing drought stress strongly affected the composition of the exudate metabolome. Plant exudates under drought consisted mainly of secondary metabolites (71% of total metabolites) associated with plant responses to drought stress, whereas the metabolite composition under recovery shifted towards a dominance of primary metabolites (81% of total metabolites). These results strongly suggested that roots exude the most abundant root metabolites. The exudates were changed irreversibly by the lack of water under extreme drought conditions, and the plants could not recover.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available