4.7 Article

First-principles investigation of the micromechanical properties of fcc-hcp polymorphic high-entropy alloys

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29588-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Steel Producers' Association
  3. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  4. Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
  5. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA 109570]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-entropy alloys offer a promising alternative in several high-technology applications concerning functional, safety and health aspects. Many of these new alloys compete with traditional structural materials in terms of mechanical characteristics. Understanding and controlling their properties are of the outmost importance in order to find the best single-or multiphase solutions for specific uses. Here, we employ first-principles alloy theory to address the micro-mechanical properties of five polymorphic high-entropy alloys in their face-centered cubic (fcc) and hexagonal close-packed (hcp) phases. Using the calculated elastic parameters, we analyze the mechanical stability, elastic anisotropy, and reveal a strong correlation between the polycrystalline moduli and the average valence electron concentration. We investigate the ideal shear strength of two selected alloys under shear loading and show that the hcp phase possesses more than two times larger intrinsic strength than that of the fcc phase. The derived half-width of the dislocation core predicts a smaller Peierls barrier in the fcc phase confirming its increased ductility compared to the hcp one. The present theoretical findings explain a series of important observations made on dual-phase alloys and provide an atomic-level knowledge for an intelligent design of further high-entropy materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available