4.7 Article

Impact of Age and Diastolic Function on Novel, 4D flow CMR Biomarkers of Left Ventricular Blood Flow Kinetic Energy

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32707-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIHR Leeds Clinical Research Facility
  2. British Heart Foundation [FS/10/62/28409]
  3. Dutch ZonMw [104003001]
  4. British Heart Foundation [RG/16/1/32092, FS/10/62/28409] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-dimensional (2D) methods of assessing mitral inflow velocities are pre-load dependent, limiting their reliability for evaluating diastolic function. Left ventricular (LV) blood flow kinetic energy (KE) derived from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow CMR) may offer improvements. It remains unclear whether 4D LV blood flow KE parameters are associated with physiological factors, such as age when compared to 2D mitral inflow velocities. Fifty-three healthy volunteers underwent standard CMR, plus 4D flow acquisition. LV blood flow KE parameters demonstrated good reproducibility with mean coefficient of variation of 6 +/- 2% and an accuracy of 99% with a precision of 97%. The LV blood flow KEi(EDV) E/A ratio demonstrated good association to the 2D mitral inflow E/A ratio (r = 0.77, P < 0.01), with both decreasing progressively with advancing age (P < 0.01). Furthermore, peak E-wave KEi(EDV) and A-wave KEi(EDV) displayed a stronger association to age than the corresponding 2D metrics, peak E-wave and A-wave velocity (r = -0.51 vs-0.17 and r = 0.65 vs 0.46). Peak E-wave KEi(EDV) decreases whilst peak A-wave KEi(EDV) increases with advancing age. This study presents values for various LV blood flow KE parameters in health, as well as demonstrating that they show stronger and independent correlations to age than standard diastolic metrics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available