4.7 Article

Computational detection and quantification of human and mouse neutrophil extracellular traps in flow cytometry and confocal microscopy

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18099-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Center Support Grant [5P30CA016056]
  2. Pathology and Anatomical Sciences Department, University at Buffalo
  3. [R01 CA188900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are extracellular defense mechanisms used by neutrophils, where chromatin is expelled together with histones and granular/cytoplasmic proteins. They have become an immunology hotspot, implicated in infections, but also in a diverse array of diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes, and cancer. However, the precise assessment of in vivo relevance in different disease settings has been hampered by limited tools to quantify occurrence of extracellular traps in experimental models and human samples. To expedite progress towards improved quantitative tools, we have developed computational pipelines to identify extracellular traps from an in vitro human samples visualized using the Image Stream (R) platform (Millipore Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany), and confocal images of an in vivo mouse disease model of aspergillus fumigatus pneumonia. Our two in vitro methods, tested on n = 363/n = 145 images respectively, achieved holdout sensitivity/specificity 0.98/0.93 and 1/0.92. Our unsupervised method for thin lung tissue sections in murine fungal pneumonia achieved sensitivity/specificity 0.99/0.98 in n = 14 images. Our supervised method for thin lung tissue classified NETs with sensitivity/specificity 0.86/0.90. We expect that our approach will be of value for researchers, and have application in infectious and inflammatory diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available