4.6 Article

Five-year analysis from phase 2 trial of sandwich chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed, stage IE to IIE, nasal type, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

Journal

CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 33-40

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.569

Keywords

Chemoradiotherapy; extranodal natural killer; T-cell lymphoma; long-term survival; l-asparaginase prednisone; prognostic factors; vincristine

Categories

Funding

  1. West China Hospital, Chengdu, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sandwich protocol, was first proposed by us and comprised of l-asparaginase, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy with radiotherapy, results in 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates that surpass traditional therapies for patients with newly diagnosed, stage IE-IIE, nasal type, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. The results had been published by cancer. These patients were followed up over a median period of 67months, for which updates and the results of prognostic factors analyses are presented. The 5-year overall survival and progress-free survival rates were both 64%. The highest rates of death occurred during the first 6months, and between the second and third year after enrollment. The initial therapeutic response (odds ratio=5.83; P=0.001) and B symptoms (odds ratio=6.13; P = 0.043) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. However, the international prognostic index was not significant for progress-free survival and overall survival. There were no severe long-term side effects. These results indicate that the sandwich protocol may benefit the long-term survival of patients with newly diagnosed stage IE-IIE, nasal type, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. However, additional studies with larger samples are required to confirm these results. This study is registered at (ChicTR-TNC-09000394).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available