4.7 Article

Proteomic Analysis Reveals Dab2 Mediated Receptor Endocytosis Promotes Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cell Dedifferentiation

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13917-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese State Key Projects for Basic Research (973 Program) [2014CBA02001, 2013CB910502]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2016YFC0902400, SQ2017YFSF090210]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81123001, 81570526]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [7152036]
  5. Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Proteomics (Academy of Military Medical Sciences) [SKLP-O201509]
  6. [16CXZ027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sinusoidal dedifferentiation is a complicated process induced by several factors, and exists in early stage of diverse liver diseases. The mechanism of sinusoidal dedifferentiation is poorly unknown. In this study, we established a NaAsO2-induced sinusoidal dedifferentiation mice model. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells were isolated and isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) based proteomic approach was adopted to globally examine the effects of arsenic on liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) during the progression of sinusoidal dedifferentiation. In all, 4205 proteins were identified and quantified by iTRAQ combined with LC-MS/MS analysis, of which 310 proteins were significantly changed in NaAsO2 group, compared with the normal control. Validation by western blot showed increased level of clathrin-associated sorting protein Disabled 2 (Dab(2)) in NaAsO2 group, indicating that it may regulate receptor endocytosis, which served as a mechanism to augment intracellular VEGF signaling. Moreover, we found that knockdown of Dab(2) reduced the uptake of VEGF in LSECs, furthermore blocking VEGF-mediated LSEC dedifferentiation and angiogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available