Journal
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04872-6
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- clinical research of RNA amplification technology in tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment [W2013RNA01]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To evaluate the diagnostic utilities of different methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) detection in pleural fluid that represent potentially cost-effective measures for resource-limited settings in China. We compared diagnostic characteristics of the AmpSure simultaneous amplification and testing method, the BACTEC MGIT 960 system, and acid-fast bacilli staining of specimen smears for detection of M. tuberculosis in pleural fluids of 438 patients with suspected tuberculous pleurisy. Chest radiographs, computed tomography scans and the results of sputum and pleural biopsy testing were used for confirmations of tuberculosis diagnoses. The sensitivity of the AmpSure test (21.2%) was significantly higher than that of smear analysis (3.1%; p < 0.001), but was similar to that of the BACTEC culture method (17.8%; p > 0.05). The specificity of the AmpSure, BACTEC, and smear tests were 100%, 96.4%, and 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of the AmpSure, BACTEC, and smear tests were 100%/ 23.1%; 78.6%/ 19.8%; and 100%/22.4%, respectively. The sensitivity of ADA, IFN gamma and histopathological analyses of pleural biopsies were all 100%. The sensitivities of all three methods were suboptimal for the detection of M. tuberculosis in pleural fluid. Future studies of a composite diagnostic index consisting of a combination of these tests are warranted.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available