4.7 Article

Aligning cellulose nanofibril dispersions for tougher fibers

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12107-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland Center of Excellence Programme
  2. Academy of Finland [264677, 259034]
  3. European Research Council
  4. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  5. Wihuri Foundation
  6. Tiina and Antti Herlin Foundation
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [259034, 264677, 259034, 264677] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocomposite materials made from cellulose show a great potential as future high-performance and sustainable materials. We show how high aspect ratio cellulose nanofibrils can be efficiently aligned in extrusion to fibers, leading to increased modulus of toughness (area under the stress-strain curve), Young's modulus, and yield strength by increasing the extrusion capillary length, decreasing its diameter, and increasing the flow rate. The materials showed significant property combinations, manifesting as high modulus of toughness (similar to 28-31 MJ/m(3)) vs. high stiffness (similar to 19-20 GPa), and vs. high yield strength (similar to 130-150 MPa). Wide angle X-ray scattering confirmed that the enhanced mechanical properties directly correlated with increased alignment. The achieved moduli of toughness are approximately double or more when compared to values reported in the literature for corresponding strength and stiffness. Our results highlight a possibly general pathway that can be integrated to gel-spinning process, suggesting the hypothesis that that high stiffness, strength and toughness can be achieved simultaneously, if the alignment is induced while the CNF are in the free-flowing state during the extrusion step by shear at relatively low concentration and in pure water, after which they can be coagulated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available