4.7 Article

Hearables: Multimodal physiological in-ear sensing

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06925-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Rosetrees Trust
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR-RP-011-048]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K025643/1, PSA256]
  4. MURI/EPSRC [EP/P008461]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P009204/1, 1402777, EP/K025643/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_14100] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR-RP-011-048] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Rosetrees Trust [M390] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. EPSRC [EP/P009204/1, EP/K025643/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MC_PC_14100] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future health systems require the means to assess and track the neural and physiological function of a user over long periods of time, and in the community. Human body responses are manifested through multiple, interacting modalities - the mechanical, electrical and chemical; yet, current physiological monitors (e.g. actigraphy, heart rate) largely lack in cross-modal ability, are inconvenient and/or stigmatizing. We address these challenges through an inconspicuous earpiece, which benefits from the relatively stable position of the ear canal with respect to vital organs. Equipped with miniature multimodal sensors, it robustly measures the brain, cardiac and respiratory functions. Comprehensive experiments validate each modality within the proposed earpiece, while its potential in wearable health monitoring is illustrated through case studies spanning these three functions. We further demonstrate how combining data from multiple sensors within such an integrated wearable device improves both the accuracy of measurements and the ability to deal with artifacts in real-world scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available