4.7 Article

Phonon Conduction in Silicon Nanobeam Labyrinths

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06479-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1336734, ECCS-1542152]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division [DE-SC0001299/DE-FG02-09ER46577]
  3. United States Department of Defense, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship [32 CFR 168a]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1336734] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06722] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we study single-crystalline silicon nanobeams having 470 nm width and 80 nm thickness cross section, where we produce tortuous thermal paths (i.e. labyrinths) by introducing slits to control the impact of the unobstructed line-of-sight (LOS) between the heat source and heat sink. The labyrinths range from straight nanobeams with a complete LOS along the entire length to nanobeams in which the LOS ranges from partially to entirely blocked by introducing slits, s = 95, 195, 245, 295 and 395 nm. The measured thermal conductivity of the samples decreases monotonically from similar to 47 W m(-1) K-1 for straight beam to similar to 31 W m(-1) K-1 for slit width of 395 nm. A model prediction through a combination of the Boltzmann transport equation and ab initio calculations shows an excellent agreement with the experimental data to within similar to 8%. The model prediction for the most tortuous path (s = 395 nm) is reduced by similar to 14% compared to a straight beam of equivalent cross section. This study suggests that LOS is an important metric for characterizing and interpreting phonon propagation in nanostructures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available