4.7 Article

Relationship between fraction of exhaled nitric oxide and airway morphology assessed by three-dimensional CT analysis in asthma

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10504-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K19448, 15K09214] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) provides information about chronic inflammation in asthma. However, its relationship with structural changes in the airways is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between computer-based airway changes and FeNO in patients with asthma. The wall area (WA) and airway inner luminal area (Ai) of the third-to sixth-generation bronchi were measured using three-dimensional computed tomography in asthmatic patients. Each value was corrected by body surface area (BSA). Relationships between FeNO and WA/BSA and Ai/BSA were evaluated. Forty-one clinically stable patients with asthma were evaluated. FeNO was significantly correlated with WA/BSA of the third-, fourth-, fifth- and sixth-generation bronchi (Spearman correlation coefficient (rho) = 0.326, p = 0.041;. = 0.356, p = 0.025;. = 0.496, p = 0.002; and. = 0.529, p < 0.001, respectively). The correlation with sixth-generation bronchi was significantly greater than with the third- generation bronchi (p = 0.047). Partial rank correlation analysis indicated FeNO was significantly correlated with WA/BSA of the sixth-generation bronchi, independent from confounding factors of Ai/BSA, age, duration of asthma, dose of inhaled corticosteroid, blood eosinophil percentage, and blood IgE (rho = 0.360, p = 0.034). In contrast, there was no correlation between FeNO and Ai/BSA. FeNO correlates with bronchial wall thickening in asthma patients. Measurement of FeNO may be useful to detect airway remodeling in asthma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available