4.7 Article

Interaction between G-Quadruplex and Zinc Cationic Porphyrin: The Role of the Axial Water

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11413-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21425313, 21333012, 21373233]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB834602]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB12020200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction of ligands with G-quadruplexes has attracted considerable attention due to its importance in molecular recognition and anticancer drugs design. Here, we utilize triplet excited state as a sensitive reporter to study the binding interaction of zinc cationic porphyrin (ZnTMPyP4) with three G-quadruplexes, AG(3)(T(2)AG(3))(3), (G(4)T(4)G(4))(2), and (TG(4)T)4. By monitoring the triplet decay dynamics of ZnTMPyP4 with transient absorption spectroscopy, the coexisted binding modes via p-p stacking of porphyrin macrocycle and the G-quartets are allowed to be identified quantitatively, which involve intercalation (25% and 36%) versus end-stacking (75% and 64%) for AG(3)(T(2)AG(3))(3) and (G(4)T(4)G(4))(2), and end-stacking (23%) versus partial intercalation (77%) for (TG(4)T)4. It is shown that the steric hindrance of the axial water decreases greatly the percentage of intercalation. Further, a rapid assessment of binding stoichiometry is fulfilled by measuring the triplet decay dynamics under various [G-quadruplex]/[ZnTMPyP4] ratios. The binding stoichiometric ratios of G-quadruplex/ZnTMPyP4 are 1:2 for AG(3)(T(2)AG(3))(3), 1:1 for (G(4)T(4)G(4)) 2, and 1:2 for (TG(4)T)4, which agree well with results obtained by the conventional method of continuous variation analysis. These results reveal a clear scenario of G-quadruplex/ZnTMPyP4 interaction and provide mechanistic insights for the application of anticancer drug designs using G-quadruplex as target.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available