4.7 Article

The Gαi-GIV binding interface is a druggable protein-protein interaction

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08829-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01GM108733, R01GM112631]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-13-362-01-TBE, IRG-72-001-36]
  3. Karin Grunebaum Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2014-56966-R]
  5. Hartwell Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterotrimeric G proteins are usually activated by the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity of GPCRs. However, some non-receptor proteins are also GEFs. GIV (a.k.a Girdin) was the first non-receptor protein for which the GEF activity was ascribed to a well-defined protein sequence that directly binds G alpha i. GIV expression promotes metastasis and disruption of its binding to G alpha i blunts the pro-metastatic behavior of cancer cells. Although this suggests that inhibition of the G alpha i-GIV interaction is a promising therapeutic strategy, protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are considered poorly druggable targets requiring case-by-case validation. Here, we set out to investigate whether G alpha i-GIV is a druggable PPI. We tested a collection of >1,000 compounds on the G alpha i-GIV PPI by in silico ligand screening and separately by a chemical high-throughput screening (HTS) assay. Two hits, ATA and NF023, obtained in both screens were confirmed in secondary HTS and low-throughput assays. The binding site of NF023, identified by NMR spectroscopy and biochemical assays, overlaps with the G alpha i-GIV interface. Importantly, NF023 did not disrupt G alpha i-G beta gamma binding, indicating its specificity toward G alpha i-GIV. This work establishes the G alpha i-GIV PPI as a druggable target and sets the conceptual and technical framework for the discovery of novel inhibitors of this PPI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available