4.7 Article

Revealing the insoluble metasecretome of lignocellulose-degrading microbial communities

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02506-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/1018492/1, BB/K020358/1]
  2. BBSRC Network in Biotechnology and Bioenergy BIOCATNET
  3. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [10/52362-5]
  4. BBSRC Doctoral Training Programme [BB/J014443/1]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M028445/1, 1312478, BB/I018492/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/I018492/1, BB/K020358/1, BB/M028445/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial communities metabolize plant biomass using secreted enzymes; however, identifying extracellular proteins tightly bound to insoluble lignocellulose in these microbiomes presents a challenge, as the rigorous extraction required to elute these proteins also lyses the microbes associated with the plant biomass releasing intracellular proteins that contaminate the metasecretome. Here we describe a technique for targeting the extracellular proteome, which was used to compare the metasecretome and meta-surface-proteome of two lignocellulose-degrading communities grown on wheat straw and rice straw. A combination of mass spectrometry-based proteomics coupled with metatranscriptomics enabled the identification of a unique secretome pool from these lignocellulose-degrading communities. This method enabled us to efficiently discriminate the extracellular proteins from the intracellular proteins by improving detection of actively secreted and transmembrane proteins. In addition to the expected carbohydrate active enzymes, our new method reveals a large number of unknown proteins, supporting the notion that there are major gaps in our understanding of how microbial communities degrade lignocellulosic substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available