4.3 Article

Lower hazard ratio for death in women with cerebral hemorrhage

Journal

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 132, Issue 1, Pages 59-64

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12359

Keywords

cerebrovascular diseases; neuroepidemiology; strokes; sex, early outcome

Funding

  1. Kyoto Medical Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives - The aim of the study was to clarify the hazard ratio for death within 30 days after stroke comparing women to men. Material and methods - We reviewed all stroke patients registered in the Kyoto Stroke Registry (from January 1999 to December 2009) in Japan. Hazard ratio (HR) for death and 95% confidence interval were calculated by the Cox regression in stroke and in each stroke subtype: cerebral infarction (CI), cerebral hemorrhage, (CH) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We also evaluated HR for death in women in each consciousness level at the onset of stroke: the Japan Coma Scale (JCS) 0 (alert), JCS 1-digit code (disoriented but awake), JCS 2-digit code (arousable with stimulation), and JCS 3-digit code (unarousable). Results - A total of 13,788 patients were analyzed. HR for death comparing women to men were 1.04 (0.88-1.23, P = 0.66 in stroke as a whole), 0.91 (0.69-1.21, P = 0.51 in CI), 0.53 (0.41-0.71, P < 0.01 in CH), and 0.89 (0.60-1.30, P = 0.535 in SAH) after adjustment for age and histories of hypertension, arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipemia and uses of tobacco and alcohol. Stratified by JCS, HR for death in women with CH were 0.32 (0.11-0.94 in JCS0), 0.48 (0.28-0.82 in JCS1), 0.49 (0.28-0.83 in JCS2), and 0.79 (0.65-0.97 in JCS3), respectively. HR for death in women with CI in JCS3 was significantly lower than in men (0.71; 0.52-0.98). Conclusion - We evaluated HR for death comparing men to women in stroke and in each stroke subtype. Women with CH had lower HR for death within 30 days after stroke than men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available