4.7 Article

Major cause of unprecedented Arctic warming in January 2016: Critical role of an Atlantic windstorm

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep40051

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korean government [KMIPA2015-2093 (PN16040)]
  2. 'Development and Application of the Korea Polar Prediction System (KPOPS) for Climate Change and Weather Disaster' project of the Korea Polar Research Institute [PE16100]
  3. US NSF [ARC-1023592]
  4. Korea Polar Research Institute of Marine Research Placement (KOPRI) [PE16100] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1023592] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In January 2016, the Arctic experienced an extremely anomalous warming event after an extraordinary increase in air temperature at the end of 2015. During this event, a strong intrusion of warm and moist air and an increase in downward longwave radiation, as well as a loss of sea ice in the Barents and Kara seas, were observed. Observational analyses revealed that the abrupt warming was triggered by the entry of a strong Atlantic windstorm into the Arctic in late December 2015, which brought enormous moist and warm air masses to the Arctic. Although the storm terminated at the eastern coast of Greenland in late December, it was followed by a prolonged blocking period in early 2016 that sustained the extreme Arctic warming. Numerical experiments indicate that the warming effect of sea ice loss and associated upward turbulent heat fluxes are relatively minor in this event. This result suggests the importance of the synoptically driven warm and moist air intrusion into the Arctic as a primary contributing factor of this extreme Arctic warming event.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available