4.7 Article

Noninvasive quantification of blood potassium concentration from ECG in hemodialysis patients

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep42492

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CHIRON Project - Cyclic and person-centric Health management: Integrated appRoach for hOme, mobile and clinical eNvironments within the ARTEMIS JOINT UNDERTAKING [2009-1-100228]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blood potassium concentration ([K+]) influences the electrocardiogram (ECG), particularly T-wave morphology. We developed a new method to quantify [K+] from T-wave analysis and tested its clinical applicability on data from dialysis patients, in whom [K+] varies significantly during the therapy. To elucidate the mechanism linking [K+] and T-wave, we also analysed data from long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2) patients, testing the hypothesis that our method would have underestimated [K+] in these patients. Moreover, a computational model was used to explore the physiological processes underlying our estimator at the cellular level. We analysed 12-lead ECGs from 45 haemodialysis and 12 LQT2 patients. T-wave amplitude and downslope were calculated from the first two eigenleads. The T-wave slope-to-amplitude ratio (T-S/A) was used as starting point for an ECG-based [K+] estimate (K-ECG). Leave-one- out cross-validation was performed. Agreement between K-ECG and reference [K+] from blood samples was promising (error: -0.09 +/- 0.59 mM, absolute error: 0.46 +/- 0.39 mM). The analysis on LQT2 patients, also supported by the outcome of computational analysis, reinforces our interpretation that, at the cellular level, delayed-rectifier potassium current is a main contributor of KECG correlation to blood [K+]. Following a comprehensive validation, this method could be effectively applied to monitor patients at risk for hyper/hypokalemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available