4.7 Article

Plasmonic nanomeshes: their ambivalent role as transparent electrodes in organic solar cells

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep42530

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB840]
  2. Bavarian State Ministry for Environment and Consumer Protection (UMWELTnanoTECH)
  3. Bavarian State Ministry for Education, Culture, Science and Arts (Solartechnologies Go Hybrid)
  4. Leibniz Institut fur Polymerforschung (IPF) Dresden e.V.
  5. Elite Network Bavaria (ENB)
  6. Cluster of Excellence Centre for Advancing Electronics Dresden (CFAED)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this contribution, the optical losses and gains attributed to periodic nanohole array electrodes in polymer solar cells are systematically studied. For this, thin gold nanomeshes with hexagonally ordered holes and periodicities (P) ranging from 202 nm to 2560 nm are prepared by colloidal lithography. In combination with two different active layer materials (P3HT: PC61BM and PTB7: PC71BM), the optical properties are correlated with the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the solar cells. A cavity mode is identified at the absorption edge of the active layer material. The resonance wavelength of this cavity mode is hardly defined by the nanomesh periodicity but rather by the absorption of the photoactive layer. This constitutes a fundamental dilemma when using nanomeshes as ITO replacement. The highest plasmonic enhancement requires small periodicities. This is accompanied by an overall low transmittance and high parasitic absorption losses. Consequently, larger periodicities with a less efficient cavity mode, yet lower absorptive losses were found to yield the highest PCE. Nevertheless, ITO-free solar cells reaching similar to 77% PCE compared to ITO reference devices are fabricated. Concomitantly, the benefits and drawbacks of this transparent nanomesh electrode are identified, which is of high relevance for future ITO replacement strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available