4.7 Article

Controllable Synthesis of TiO2@Fe2O3 Core-Shell Nanotube Arrays with Double-Wall Coating as Superb Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep40927

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572129, U1407106]
  2. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2016YFE0111500]
  3. QingLan Project of Jiangsu Province
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30915011204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highlighted by the safe operation and stable performances, titanium oxides (TiO2) are deemed as promising candidates for next generation lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, the pervasively low capacity is casting shadow on desirable electrochemical behaviors and obscuring their practical applications. In this work, we reported a unique template-assisted and two-step atomic layer deposition (ALD) method to achieve TiO2@Fe2O3 core-shell nanotube arrays with hollow interior and double-wall coating. The as-prepared architecture combines both merits of the high specific capacity of Fe2O3 and structural stability of TiO2 backbone. Owing to the nanotubular structural advantages integrating facile strain relaxation as well as rapid ion and electron transport, the TiO2@ Fe2O3 nanotube arrays with a high mass loading of Fe2O3 attained desirable capacity of similar to 520 mA h g(-1), exhibiting both good rate capability under uprated current density of 10 A g(-1) and especially enhanced cycle stability (similar to 450 mA h g(-1) after 600 cycles), outclassing most reported TiO2@metal oxide composites. The results not only provide a new avenue for hybrid core-shell nanotube formation, but also offer an insight for rational design of advanced electrode materials for LIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available