4.7 Article

IFN type I and II induce BAFF secretion from human decidual stromal cells

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep39904

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. The Swedish Research Council [K2012-57X-22047-01-6]
  2. Region Vastra Gotaland
  3. The Health and Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Vastra Gotaland
  4. Torsten and Ragnar Soderberg's foundation
  5. Hedberg foundation
  6. Magnus Bergvall foundation
  7. IngaBritt and Arne Lundberg's foundation
  8. Swedish Research Council [K2012-99X-22013-01-3]
  9. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation [PR2013-0020]
  10. Cancer Society in Stockholm [141193]
  11. Swedish Cancer Foundation [CAN 2014/793]
  12. Karolinska Institutet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

B cell activating factor (BAFF) is a critical cytokine for maturation of immature B cells. In murine lymph nodes, BAFF is mainly produced by podoplanin-expressing stromal cells. We have previously shown that circulating BAFF levels are maximal at birth, and that farmers' children exhibit higher BAFF levels in cord blood than non-farmers' children. Here, we sought to investigate whether maternal-derived decidual stromal cells from placenta secrete BAFF and examine what factors could stimulate this production. We found that podoplanin is expressed in decidua basalis and in the underlying villous tissue as well as on isolated maternal-derived decidual stromal cells. Decidual stromal cells produced BAFF when stimulated with IFN-gamma and IFN-alpha, and NK cells and NK-T-like cells competent of IFN-gamma production were isolated from the decidua. Finally, B cells at different maturational stages are present in decidua and all expressed BAFF-R, while stromal cells did not. These findings suggest that decidual stromal cells are a cellular source of BAFF for B cells present in decidua during pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available