4.7 Article

Precise measurement of ultra-narrow laser linewidths using the strong coherent envelope

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep41988

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Key research and development program of Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFC0801202]
  2. Project of Natural Science Foundation of China [61635004, 61377066]
  3. science fund for distinguished young scholars of Chongqing [CSTC2014JCYJJQ40002]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112015CDJXY120009]
  5. Opened Fund of the State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laser linewidth narrowing down to kHz or even Hz is an important topic in areas like clock synchronization technology, laser radars, quantum optics, and high-precision detection. Conventional decoherence measurement methods like delayed self-heterodyne/homodyne interferometry cannot measure such narrow linewidths accurately. This is because a broadening of the Gaussian spectrum, which hides the laser's intrinsic Lorentzian linewidth, cannot be avoided. Here, we introduce a new method using the strong coherent envelope to characterize the laser's intrinsic linewidth through self-coherent detection. This method can eliminate the effect of the broadened Gaussian spectrum induced by the 1/f frequency noise. We analyze, in detail, the relationship between intrinsic laser linewidth, contrast difference with the second peak and the second trough (CDSPST) of the strong coherent envelope, and the length of the delaying fiber. The correct length for the delaying fiber can be chosen by combining the estimated laser linewidth (Delta f(est)) with a specific CDSPST (Delta S) to obtain the accurate laser linewidth (Delta f). Our results indicate that this method can be used as an accurate detection tool for measurements of narrow or super-narrow linewidths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available