4.7 Article

Sequence analysis of pooled bacterial samples enables identification of strain variation in group A streptococcus

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep45771

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [259793, 255922, 255636, 255985]
  2. Tekes funding for SalWe GetItDone program
  3. Research funds of Hospital District of Southwest Finland
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Distinguished Professor Award at Karolinska Institutet
  6. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [255922, 255922, 255636, 259793, 255985, 259793, 255636, 255985] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of the genomic variation among different strains of a pathogenic microbial species can help in selecting optimal candidates for diagnostic assays and vaccine development. Pooled sequencing (Pool-seq) is a cost effective approach for population level genetic studies that require large numbers of samples such as various strains of a microbe. To test the use of Pool-seq in identifying variation, we pooled DNA of 100 Streptococcus pyogenes strains of different emm types in two pools, each containing 50 strains. We used four variant calling tools (Freebayes, UnifiedGenotyper, SNVer, and SAMtools) and one emm1 strain, SF370, as a reference genome. In total 63719 SNPs and 164 INDELs were identified in the two pools concordantly by at least two of the tools. Majority of the variants (93.4%) from six individually sequenced strains used in the pools could be identified from the two pools and 72.3% and 97.4% of the variants in the pools could be mined from the analysis of the 44 complete Str. pyogenes genomes and 3407 sequence runs deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive respectively. We conclude that DNA sequencing of pooled samples of large numbers of bacterial strains is a robust, rapid and cost-efficient way to discover sequence variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available