4.7 Article

Risk assessment of recent Egyptian H5N1 influenza viruses

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep38388

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Research on Influenza Pathogenesis (CRIP) - NIAID [HHSN272201400008C]
  2. Leading Advanced Projects for medical innovation (LEAP)
  3. Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases (J-GRID)
  4. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [16H06429, 16K21723, 16H06434]
  6. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [AID-263-IO-11-00001, OSRO/EGY/101/USA]
  7. General Organization for Veterinary Services (GoVS)
  8. National Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control of Poultry Production (NLQP)
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16J07228, 16K08016, 16K08017] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5N1 subtype are enzootic in poultry populations in different parts of the world, and have caused numerous human infections in recent years, particularly in Egypt. However, no sustained human-to-human transmission of these viruses has yet been reported. We tested nine naturally occurring Egyptian H5N1 viruses (isolated in 2014-2015) in ferrets and found that three of them transmitted via respiratory droplets, causing a fatal infection in one of the exposed animals. All isolates were sensitive to neuraminidase inhibitors. However, these viruses were not transmitted via respiratory droplets in three additional transmission experiments in ferrets. Currently, we do not know if the efficiency of transmission is very low or if subtle differences in experimental parameters contributed to these inconsistent results. Nonetheless, our findings heighten concern regarding the pandemic potential of recent Egyptian H5N1 influenza viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available