4.7 Article

Persistent northward North Atlantic tropical cyclone track migration over the past five centuries

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep37522

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ERC [240167]
  2. NSF [BCS-0620445, HSD-0827305, HSD-0827275, BCS-0940744]
  3. Alphawood Foundation
  4. Schweizer National Fund, Sinergia [CRSI22132646/1]
  5. Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research [CRN2050]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment program
  7. NOAA Climate Program Office
  8. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [240167] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurately predicting future tropical cyclone risk requires understanding the fundamental controls on tropical cyclone dynamics. Here we present an annually-resolved 450-year reconstruction of western Caribbean tropical cyclone activity developed using a new coupled carbon and oxygen isotope ratio technique in an exceptionally well-dated stalagmite from Belize. Western Caribbean tropical cyclone activity peaked at 1650 A. D., coincident with maximum Little Ice Age cooling, and decreased gradually until the end of the record in 1983. Considered with other reconstructions, the new record suggests that the mean track of Cape Verde tropical cyclones shifted gradually north-eastward from the western Caribbean toward the North American east coast over the last 450 years. Since similar to 1870 A. D., these shifts were largely driven by anthropogenic greenhouse gas and sulphate aerosol emissions. Our results strongly suggest that future emission scenarios will result in more frequent tropical cyclone impacts on the financial and population centres of the northeastern United States.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available