4.7 Article

Meteotsunamis in the Laurentian Great Lakes

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep37832

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation's Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  2. Cooperative Institute for Limnology and Ecosystems Research Long-term Great Lakes Fellowship
  3. NOAA-Coastal Storms Program
  4. UW-Madison/UW-Milwaukee Intercampus Research Incentive Grants Program
  5. University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute
  6. ISWS/University of Illinois, NOAA [WE-133R-15-SE-1608]
  7. Russia Foundation for Basic Research [14-50-00095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The generation mechanism of meteotsunamis, which are meteorologically induced water waves with spatial/ temporal characteristics and behavior similar to seismic tsunamis, is poorly understood. We quantify meteotsunamis in terms of seasonality, causes, and occurrence frequency through the analysis of long-term water level records in the Laurentian Great Lakes. The majority of the observed meteotsunamis happen from late-spring to mid-summer and are associated primarily with convective storms. Meteotsunami events of potentially dangerous magnitude (height > 0.3 m) occur an average of 106 times per year throughout the region. These results reveal that meteotsunamis are much more frequent than follow from historic anecdotal reports. Future climate scenarios over the United States show a likely increase in the number of days favorable to severe convective storm formation over the Great Lakes, particularly in the spring season. This would suggest that the convectively associated meteotsunamis in these regions may experience an increase in occurrence frequency or a temporal shift in occurrence to earlier in the warm season. To date, meteotsunamis in the area of the Great Lakes have been an overlooked hazard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available