4.7 Article

Aiptasia sp larvae as a model to reveal mechanisms of symbiont selection in cnidarians

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/srep32366

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Emmy-Noether-Programme of the German Research Foundation (DFG) [GU 1128/3-1]
  2. Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (CIG) [FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG program]
  3. European Commission
  4. Heidelberg University within the Excellence Initiative by German federal and state governments
  5. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal)
  6. Baden-Wurttemberg Landesgraduiertenforderung Program
  7. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Symbiosis, defined as the persistent association between two distinct species, is an evolutionary and ecologically critical phenomenon facilitating survival of both partners in diverse habitats. The biodiversity of coral reef ecosystems depends on a functional symbiosis with photosynthetic dinoflagellates of the highly diverse genus Symbiodinium, which reside in coral host cells and continuously support their nutrition. The mechanisms underlying symbiont selection to establish a stable endosymbiosis in non-symbiotic juvenile corals are unclear. Here we show for the first time that symbiont selection patterns for larvae of two Acropora coral species and the model anemone Aiptasia are similar under controlled conditions. We find that Aiptasia larvae distinguish between compatible and incompatible symbionts during uptake into the gastric cavity and phagocytosis. Using RNA-Seq, we identify a set of candidate genes potentially involved in symbiosis establishment. Together, our data complement existing molecular resources to mechanistically dissect symbiont phagocytosis in cnidarians under controlled conditions, thereby strengthening the role of Aiptasia larvae as a powerful model for cnidarian endosymbiosis establishment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available