4.7 Article

Development of a SNP array and its application to genetic mapping and diversity assessment in pepper (Capsicum spp.)

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep33293

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China [S2011030001410]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31372076]
  3. Zunyi City Natural Science Foundation of China [201201]
  4. Guizhou Province and Zunyi City Science and Technology Cooperation Project of China [201307, 201542]
  5. Zunyi County Technology Cooperation Project [SSX201407]
  6. Key Lab Construction Project of the Educational Department of Guizhou Province (Guizhou Education Cooperation) [KY [2014] 212]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development and application of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is in its infancy for pepper. Here, a set of 15,000 SNPs were chosen from the resequencing data to develop an array for pepper with 12,720 loci being ultimately synthesized. Of these, 8,199 (similar to 64.46%) SNPs were found to be scorable and covered similar to 81.18% of the whole genome. With this array, a high-density interspecific genetic map with 5,569 SNPs was constructed using 297 F-2 individuals, and genetic diversity of a panel of 399 pepper elite/landrace lines was successfully characterized. Based on the genetic map, one major QTL, named Up12.1, was detected for the fruit orientation trait. A total of 65 protein-coding genes were predicted within this QTL region based on the current annotation of the Zunla-1 genome. In summary, the thousands of well-validated SNP markers, high-density genetic map and genetic diversity information will be useful for molecular genetics and innovative breeding in pepper. Furthermore, the mapping results lay foundation for isolating the genes underlying variation in fruit orientation of Capsicum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available