4.7 Article

V2O5-C-SnO2 Hybrid Nanobelts as High Performance Anodes for Lithium-ion Batteries

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep33597

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402147, 51406075]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars (State Education Ministry)
  3. Guangdong-Hong Kong joint innovation project [2016A050503012]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2015A030306044]
  5. Foundation of Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [ZDSYS20140509142721431, JCYJ20150331101823695, JCYJ20130401170306829]
  6. South University of Science and Technology of China [SITP2014 x 01, SITP 2014 x 11, SITP 2015 x 02, SITP 2015 x 11, pdjh2015b0466, pdjh2015b0467]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The superior performance of metal oxide nanocomposites has introduced them as excellent candidates for emerging energy sources, and attracted significant attention in recent years. The drawback of these materials is their inherent structural pulverization which adversely impacts their performance and makes the rational design of stable nanocomposites a great challenge. In this work, functional V2O5-C-SnO2 hybrid nanobelts (VCSNs) with a stable structure are introduced where the ultradispersed SnO2 nanocrystals are tightly linked with glucose on the V2O5 surface. The nanostructured V2O5 acts as a supporting matrix as well as an active electrode component. Compared with existing carbon-V2O5 hybrid nanobelts, these hybrid nanobelts exhibit a much higher reversible capacity and architectural stability when used as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. The superior cyclic performance of VCSNs can be attributed to the synergistic effects of SnO2 and V2O5. However, limited data are available for V2O5-based anodes in lithium-ion battery design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available