4.7 Article

Altered brain ion gradients following compensation for elevated CO2 are linked to behavioural alterations in a coral reef fish

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep33216

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DGIE-0951782, IOS 1146695]
  2. University of Miami Koczy Fellowship
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
  4. ARC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurosensory and behavioural disruptions are some of the most consistently reported responses upon exposure to ocean acidification-relevant CO2 levels, especially in coral reef fishes. The underlying cause of these disruptions is thought to be altered current across the GABA(A) receptor in neuronal cells due to changes in ion gradients (HCO3 and/or Cl) that occur in the body following compensation for elevated ambient CO2. Despite these widely-documented behavioural disruptions, the present study is the first to pair a behavioural assay with measurements of relevant intracellular and extracellular acid-base parameters in a coral reef fish exposed to elevated CO2. Spiny damselfish (Acanthochromis polyacanthus) exposed to 1900 mu atm CO2 for 4 days exhibited significantly increased intracellular and extracellular HCO3- concentrations and elevated brain pHi compared to control fish, providing evidence of CO2 compensation. As expected, high CO2 exposed damselfish spent significantly more time in a chemical alarm cue (CAC) than control fish, supporting a potential link between behavioural disruption and CO2 compensation. Using HCO3- measurements from the damselfish, the reversal potential for GABA(A) (E-GABA) was calculated, illustrating that biophysical properties of the brain during CO2 compensation could change GABA(A) receptor function and account for the behavioural disturbances noted during exposure to elevated CO2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available