4.7 Article

Incomplete immune response to coxsackie B viruses associates with early autoimmunity against insulin

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep32899

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Kompetenznetz Diabetes Mellitus (Competence Network for Diabetes Mellitus)
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ 01GI0805-07, FKZ 01GI0805]
  3. JDRF [17-2012-16, 17-2012-593]
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  5. DFG Research Center
  6. Cluster of Excellence - Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden [FZ 111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Viral infections are associated with autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes. Here, we asked whether this association could be explained by variations in host immune response to a putative type 1 etiological factor, namely coxsackie B viruses (CVB). Heterogeneous antibody responses were observed against CVB capsid proteins. Heterogeneity was largely defined by different binding to VP1 or VP2. Antibody responses that were anti-VP2 competent but anti-VP1 deficient were unable to neutralize CVB, and were characteristic of children who developed early insulin-targeting autoimmunity, suggesting an impaired ability to clear CVB in early childhood. In contrast, children who developed a GAD-targeting autoimmunity had robust VP1 and VP2 antibody responses to CVB. We further found that 20% of memory CD4(+) T cells responding to the GAD65(247-266) peptide share identical T cell receptors to T cells responding to the CVB4 p2C(30-51) peptide, thereby providing direct evidence for the potential of molecular mimicry as a mechanism for GAD autoimmunity. Here, we highlight functional immune response differences between children who develop insulin-targeting and GAD-targeting autoimmunity, and suggest that children who lose B cell tolerance to insulin within the first years of life have a paradoxical impaired ability to mount humoral immune responses to coxsackie viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available