4.7 Article

Hypertension and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep31358

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project of China
  2. Key Medical Disciplines of Zhejiang Province
  3. Health Sector Scientific Research Special Project [201002010]
  4. Combination of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Key Disciplines of Zhejiang Province [2012-XK-A23]
  5. Zhejiang Province Key Project of Science and Technology [2014C04008-2]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81502215, 81472375, 81372773]
  7. Scientific Research Foundation of the Ministry of Public Health of China [WKJ2012-2-009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The previously reported association between hypertension and prostate cancer risk was controversial. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies to summarize evidence on this association. Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases through January 2016. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. A total of 21 published studies were included in this meta-analysis. A significant increase in the risk of prostate cancer (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15, P = 0.014) was observed among individuals with hypertension. There was statistically significant heterogeneity among included studies (P < 0.001 for heterogeneity, I-2 = 72.1%). No obvious evidence of significant publication bias was detected by either Begg's test (P = 0.174) or Egger's test (P = 0.277). In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that hypertension may be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Considering the substantial heterogeneity and residual confounding among included studies, further large-scale, well-designed prospective cohorts, as well as mechanistic studies, are urgently needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available