4.5 Article

Rival male chemical cues evoke changes in male pre- and post-copulatory investment in a flour beetle

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 1021-1029

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arv047

Keywords

chemical cues; cuticular hydrocarbons; ejaculate expenditure; Gnatocerus cornutus; sperm competition risk

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  2. Royal Society
  3. Royal Society Equipment Grant [UF120087]
  4. Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship [ECF/2010/0067]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [1200188] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Royal Society [UF120087] Funding Source: Royal Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Males adjust both courtship effort and ejaculate expenditure when mating with females that are coated in the chemical cues of other males. Using a manipulative approach, we show that male flour beetles use the chemical cues of rival males left behind on virgin female cuticles to assess sperm competition risk. These cues do not make virgin females more chemically similar to mated females but appear to allow males to indirectly assess competition within the population.Males can gather information on the risk and intensity of sperm competition from their social environment. Recent studies have implicated chemosensory cues, for instance cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in insects, as a key source of this information. Here, using the broad-horned flour beetle ( we investigated the importance of contact-derived rival male CHCs in informing male perception of sperm competition risk and intensity. We experimentally perfumed virgin females with male CHCs via direct intersexual contact and measured male pre- and post-copulatory investment in response to this manipulation. Using chemical analysis, we verified that this treatment engendered changes to perfumed female CHC profiles, but did not make perfumed females smell mated. Despite this, males responded to these chemical changes. Males increased courtship effort under low levels of perceived competition (from 1-3 rivals), but significantly decreased courtship effort as perceived competition rose (from 3-5 rivals). Furthermore, our measurement of ejaculate investment showed that males allocated significantly more sperm to perfumed females than to control females. Together, these results suggest that changes in female chemical profile elicited by contact with rival males do not provide males with information on female mating status, but rather inform males of the presence of rivals within the population and thus provide a means for males to indirectly assess the risk of sperm competition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available