4.7 Article

Improve sensitization and corrosion resistance of an Al-Mg alloy by optimization of grain boundaries

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep26870

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-DMR-0955338]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-15-1-2486]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-14-1-0352]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [0955338] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sensitization and subsequent intergranular corrosion of Al-5.3 wt.% Mg alloy has been shown to be an important factor in stress corrosion cracking of Al-Mg alloys. Understanding sensitization requires the review of grain boundary character on the precipitation process which can assist in developing and designing alloys with improved corrosion resistance. This study shows that the degree of precipitation in Al-Mg alloy is dependent on grain boundary misorientation angle, adjacent grain boundary planes and grain boundary types. The results show that the misorientation angle is the most important factor influencing precipitation in grain boundaries of the Al-Mg alloy. Low angle grain boundaries (<= 15 degrees) have better immunity to precipitation and grain boundary acid attack. High angle grain boundaries (>15 degrees) are vulnerable to grain boundary acid attack. Grain boundaries with adjacent plane orientations near to {100} have potential for immunity to precipitation and grain boundary acid attack. This work shows that low Sigma (Sigma <= 29) coincident site lattice (CSL) grain boundaries have thinner beta precipitates. Modified nitric acid mass loss test and polarization test demonstrated that the global corrosion resistance of sputtered Al-Mg alloy is enhanced. This may be attributed to the increased fractions of low Sigma (Sigma <= 29) CSL grain boundaries after sputtering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available