4.7 Article

Decoherence spectroscopy with individual two-level tunneling defects

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep23786

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [SCHO 287/7-1, SH 81/2-1, LI 2446/1-1]
  2. German-Israeli Foundation (GIF) [1183-229.14/2011]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation in the framework of Increase Competitiveness Program of the NUST MISIS [K2-2014-025, K2-2015-002]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [16-12-00095, 14-42-00044]
  5. Russian Science Foundation [14-42-00044] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent progress with microfabricated quantum devices has revealed that an ubiquitous source of noise originates in tunneling material defects that give rise to a sparse bath of parasitic two-level systems (TLSs). For superconducting qubits, TLSs residing on electrode surfaces and in tunnel junctions account for a major part of decoherence and thus pose a serious roadblock to the realization of solid-state quantum processors. Here, we utilize a superconducting qubit to explore the quantum state evolution of coherently operated TLSs in order to shed new light on their individual properties and environmental interactions. We identify a frequency-dependence of TLS energy relaxation rates that can be explained by a coupling to phononic modes rather than by anticipated mutual TLS interactions. Most investigated TLSs are found to be free of pure dephasing at their energy degeneracy points, around which their Ramsey and spin-echo dephasing rates scale linearly and quadratically with asymmetry energy, respectively. We provide an explanation based on the standard tunneling model, and identify interaction with incoherent low-frequency (thermal) TLSs as the major mechanism of the pure dephasing in coherent high-frequency TLS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available