4.7 Article

Simulated Raman correlation spectroscopy for quantifying nucleic acid-silver composites

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep23535

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. NSF Center for Integrated Access Networks
  3. Office of Naval Research Multi-Disciplinary Research Initiative
  4. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
  5. Cymer Corporation
  6. National Science Foundation [ACI-1053575]
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1445158] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  10. Directorate For Engineering [1405234] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  12. Directorate For Engineering [1507146] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasmonic devices are of great interest due to their ability to confine light to the nanoscale level and dramatically increase the intensity of the electromagnetic field, functioning as high performance platforms for Raman signal enhancement. While Raman spectroscopy has been proposed as a tool to identify the preferential binding sites and adsorption configurations of molecules to nanoparticles, the results have been limited by the assumption that a single binding site is responsible for molecular adsorption. Here, we develop the simulated Raman correlation spectroscopy (SRCS) process to determine which binding sites of a molecule preferentially bind to a plasmonic material and in what capacity. We apply the method to the case of nucleic acids binding to silver, discovering that multiple atoms are responsible for adsorption kinetics. This method can be applied to future systems, such as to study the molecular orientation of adsorbates to films or protein conformation upon adsorption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available