4.7 Article

Electron Beam Induced Artifacts During in situ TEM Deformation of Nanostructured Metals

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep16345

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [ECCS 1102201, CMMI 1400505, DMR 1454109]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22440, I1309]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1454109] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1400505] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1102201] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I1309] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A critical assumption underlying in situ transmission electron microscopy studies is that the electron beam (e-beam) exposure does not fundamentally alter the intrinsic deformation behavior of the materials being probed. Here, we show that e-beam exposure causes increased dislocation activation and marked stress relaxation in aluminum and gold films spanning a range of thicknesses (80-400 nanometers) and grain sizes (50-220 nanometers). Furthermore, the e-beam induces anomalous sample necking, which unusually depends more on the e-beam diameter than intensity. Notably, the stress relaxation in both aluminum and gold occurs at beam energies well below their damage thresholds. More remarkably, the stress relaxation and/or sample necking is significantly more pronounced at lower accelerating voltages (120 kV versus 200 kV) in both the metals. These observations in aluminum and gold, two metals with highly dissimilar atomic weights and properties, indicate that e-beam exposure can cause anomalous behavior in a broad spectrum of nanostructured materials, and simultaneously suggest a strategy to minimize such artifacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available