4.3 Article

Disability, quality of life, personality, cognitive and psychological variables associated with fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis

Journal

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages 118-124

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12370

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; fatigue; personality; quality of life; disability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo examine the associations between function, quality of life, personality, cognitive and psychological outcomes with fatigue in patients with MS. MethodsOne hundred and eight patients (54% women) with definite MS participated. MS-related fatigue was assessed with the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS). Demographic and clinical data (weight, height, medication and history of pain), specific disease outcomes (Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis/FAMS), general disease outcomes (Beck Depression Inventory/BDI-II, and Short-Form Health Survey 36/SF-36) and personality (NEO Five-Factor Inventory/NEOFFI) were assessed. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to determine associations between variables. ResultsA significant positive correlation existed between the FIS and EDSS (r=0.190; P<0.05). Significant negative correlations between the FIS with specific disease (FAMS mobility: r=-0.333, P<0.01; FAMS symptoms: r=-0.443, P<0.01; FAMS emotional well-being: r=-0.412, P<0.01; FAMS general contentment: r=-0.325, P<. 01; and, FAMS thinking/fatigue: r=-0.706, P<0.01); general disease (all domains SF36: -0.508<-0.302; P<0.01); and personality (NEOFFI neuroticism: r=-0.39, P<0.01; agreeableness: r=-0.206, P<0.05; conscientiousness: r=-0.279, P<0.01) were also observed. Stepwise regression analyses revealed that FAMS thinking/fatigue, physical function (SF-36) and FAMS emotional well-being explained 62.5% of the variance in fatigue (r(2)=0.652; r(2) adjusted=0.625; F=23.774; P<0.001). ConclusionsThis study indicates that MS-related fatigue shows an impact on physical, cognitive and emotional aspects in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available