4.7 Article

Searching for superspreaders of information in real-world social media

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep05547

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF
  2. NIH
  3. NSFC [11290141, 11201018, 2010DFR00700, MJ F 2012 04]
  4. ARL [W911NF-09-2-0053]
  5. Innovation Foundation of BUAA
  6. CNPq
  7. CAPES
  8. FUNCAP
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Physics [1305476] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of predictors have been suggested to detect the most influential spreaders of information in online social media across various domains such as Twitter or Facebook. In particular, degree, PageRank, k-core and other centralities have been adopted to rank the spreading capability of users in information dissemination media. So far, validation of the proposed predictors has been done by simulating the spreading dynamics rather than following real information flow in social networks. Consequently, only model-dependent contradictory results have been achieved so far for the best predictor. Here, we address this issue directly. We search for influential spreaders by following the real spreading dynamics in a wide range of networks. We find that the widely-used degree and PageRank fail in ranking users' influence. We find that the best spreaders are consistently located in the k-core across dissimilar social platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Livejournal and scientific publishing in the American Physical Society. Furthermore, when the complete global network structure is unavailable, we find that the sum of the nearest neighbors' degree is a reliable local proxy for user's influence. Our analysis provides practical instructions for optimal design of strategies for viral'' information dissemination in relevant applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available